Baseline Condition
Pareto Condition

No of Participants 102
Pairs /participant 10
No of Pairs 1020
No of Participants 110
Pairs /participant 10
No of Pairs 1100

Analysis 1: contingency tables (descriptive statistics)

Attraction Effect
Repulsion Effect
A B D
A
TARGET
COMPETITOR
624
(61.176470588235 %)
COMPETITOR
COMPETITOR
82
(8.0392156862745 %)
COMPETITOR
DECOY
9
(0.88235294117647 %)
B
TARGET
TARGET
197
(19.313725490196 %)
COMPETITOR
TARGET
92
(9.0196078431373 %)
TARGET
DECOY
4
(0.3921568627451 %)
D
DECOY
TARGET
6
(0.58823529411765 %)
DECOY
COMPETITOR
4
(0.3921568627451 %)
DECOY
DECOY
2
(0.19607843137255 %)
A B D
A
TARGET
COMPETITOR
558
(50.727272727273 %)
COMPETITOR
COMPETITOR
119
(10.818181818182 %)
COMPETITOR
DECOY
31
(2.8181818181818 %)
B
TARGET
TARGET
188
(17.090909090909 %)
COMPETITOR
TARGET
176
(16 %)
TARGET
DECOY
5
(0.45454545454545 %)
D
DECOY
TARGET
10
(0.90909090909091 %)
DECOY
COMPETITOR
9
(0.81818181818182 %)
DECOY
DECOY
4
(0.36363636363636 %)

Analysis 2: inferential statistics (for R code)

ScoresA (10):
+1 chose Target
+0 chose Competitor
+0.5 chose Decoy
ScoresB (10):
+1 chose Competitor
+0 chose Target
+0.5 chose Decoy
Observation = ScoreA/10 - ScoreB/10
observation = 0 no bias (no attraction or repulsion effect)
observation > 0 attraction effect
observation < 0 repulsion Effect
Baseline Condition attraction scores
Pareto Condition attraction scores